Little by little,
the fact emerges that the institutions
- and the mainstream media -
have made big mistakes in addressing the Coronavirus epidemic.
Mistakes that cost very dearly
in terms of public health and safety.
the question now is to make the point of the situation
by evaluating the data that emerged
to understand how to prevent this from happening again
The institutional question: what are the proven errors
Phoney data was used to define the "fight against the Pandemic" measures (we started talking about 3.4% of death rate when we already knew that it was a "normal flu"). see Sources
The institutional data available since the beginning of the Society lockdown phase made it possible to understand how these measures were not necessary at all
● already on February 22nd (in Italy the closure of commercial activities begins on March 12th) the Director of the most important Italian Coronavirus Analysis Laboratory declares that based on the data in her possession Coronavirus is “"We swapped an infection just more serious than a flu for a lethal pandemic: it's not like that, look at the numbers" - <read Article>
● On February 25th, the Italian representative to the WHO announces that Coronavirus must be reduced: it is a normal influence «We also reduce this great alarm which is right not to be underestimated, but substantially out of 100 people 80 recover spontaneously, 15 have serious problems but that can be managed in hospital and only for 5% is lethal. Walter Ricciardi, an Italian member of the WHO Executive Committee, named councilor of the Ministry of Health ... recalled it. And it was about people [the dead] with health problems. example of normal flu. But normal flu does not kill directly, but causes decompensation in people who are already sick ".» <read Article>
● On March 17 we know that «The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population, in which the death rate from Covid-19 is much higher. … Projecting the Diamond Princess mortality rate onto the age structure of the U.S. population, the death rate among people infected with Covid-19 woluld be 0.125%. But since this estimate is based on extremely thin data the real death rate could stretch from five times lower (0.025%) to five times higher (0.625%).» <read Article>
● subsequently, on March 20, on New York times David L. Katz, the founding director of the Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center: «The data from South Korea, where tracking the coronavirus has been by far the best to date, indicate that as much as 99 percent of active cases in the general population are "mild" and do not require specific medical treatment. " - <read Article>
● March 18, it was known that 99% of dead suffered from other diseases - Bloomberg - 99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness (18-03-2020) - <read Article>
The governmental institutions invite to write in the death certificate Coronavirus as the cause of death based on even a suspect - without having been tested (even when it was known that 99% of dead suffered from other diseases - in this case it was not it is scientifically correct to indicate Coronavirus as the cause of death). see Sources ● the CDC (US health protection agency) imposes to falsify the "death certificates" «Issued March 24, the guidance tells hospitals to list COVID-19 as a cause of death regardless of whether or not there is actual testing to confirm that's the case. Instead, even if the coronavirus was just a contributing factor or if it’s “assumed to have caused or contributed to death,” it can be listed as the primary cause.» - “CDC Tells Hospitals To List COVID as Cause of Death Even if You're Just Assuming or It Only Contributed” - <read Article> ● New York Citty NYC Adds Nearly 4,000 People Who Never Tested Positive <read Article> ● it was known that 99% of dead suffered from other diseases - Bloomberg - 99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness (18-03-2020) - <read Article>
In this way the available statistics are false: the death rates are much higher.
The statistics on which the decisions of the Governments are based are bogus because the institutions filter the available data.
The lack of real value of these statistics derives from the fact that:
● the numbers of coronavirus deaths are higher than the reality, due to the institutional rules that require to count simple "suspects" of the virus as causality.see Sources
● the CDC (US health protection agency) imposes to falsify the "death certificates" «Issued March 24, the guidance tells hospitals to list COVID-19 as a cause of death regardless of whether or not there is actual testing to confirm that's the case.
Instead, even if the coronavirus was just a contributing factor or if it’s “assumed to have caused or contributed to death,” it can be listed as the primary cause.» - “CDC Tells Hospitals To List COVID as Cause of Death Even if You're Just Assuming or It Only Contributed” - <read Article>
● New York Citty NYC Adds Nearly 4,000 People Who Never Tested Positive <read Article>
● it was known that 99% of dead suffered from other diseases - Bloomberg - 99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness (18-03-2020) - <read Article>
● the numbers of people infected with the virus are extremely lower than in reality, since only a small part of the population has been tested (and the majority of the infected have an asymptomatic course).
The lack of validity of the statistics also derives from the fact that they do not take into account, for example, that ● in the previous years there was the same number of deaths from this form of disease ● many deaths from other causes were forcedly entered in the statistics see Sources ● the CDC (US health protection agency) imposes to falsify the "death certificates" «Issued March 24, the guidance tells hospitals to list COVID-19 as a cause of death regardless of whether or not there is actual testing to confirm that's the case. Instead, even if the coronavirus was just a contributing factor or if it’s “assumed to have caused or contributed to death,” it can be listed as the primary cause.» - “CDC Tells Hospitals To List COVID as Cause of Death Even if You're Just Assuming or It Only Contributed” - <read Article> ● New York Citty NYC Adds Nearly 4,000 People Who Never Tested Positive <read Article> ● it was known that 99% of dead suffered from other diseases - Bloomberg - 99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness (18-03-2020) - <read Article>
● in hospitals there is however a high number of deaths caused by "errors" (at least 4 times more than the expected Coronavirus deaths) see more
This confirms the lack of scientificity (and good faith) by government and scientific institutions: they have continued to use phoney data to justify measures such as social lockdown, making projections based on phoney data (3.4% death rate) that paint a dramatic future in terms of deaths even when the (independent) global scientific institutions announced - in early April - that the death rate was less than 0.6%. see Sources
● A Lancet (Wikipedia: "It is among the world's oldest, most prestigious, and best known general medical journals.") study reveals that “The death rate from COVID-19 is likely around 0.66%” Live Science - <read Article>
● Dr. Fauci refuses to accept the new scientific evidence: “Fauci dismisses 'conspiracy theory' of overstated US Covid-19 death toll. Top US official says ‘there is absolutely no evidence’ of claims of coronavirus overcount”. The Guardian – April 09 - <read Article>
● an example of how the press at the global level argued uncritically: a rollout of the Mainstream media of April 7, when Fauci's error was now evident The Guardian -<see Article>
[see external references]
The statistics on which the decisions of the Governments are based are bogus because:
● the numbers of coronavirus deaths are higher than the reality, due to the institutional rules that require to count simple "suspects" of the virus as causality see Sources ● the CDC (US health protection agency) imposes to falsify the "death certificates" «Issued March 24, the guidance tells hospitals to list COVID-19 as a cause of death regardless of whether or not there is actual testing to confirm that's the case. Instead, even if the coronavirus was just a contributing factor or if it’s “assumed to have caused or contributed to death,” it can be listed as the primary cause.» - “CDC Tells Hospitals To List COVID as Cause of Death Even if You're Just Assuming or It Only Contributed” - <read Article> ● New York Citty NYC Adds Nearly 4,000 People Who Never Tested Positive <read Article> ● it was known that 99% of dead suffered from other diseases - Bloomberg - 99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness (18-03-2020) - <read Article>
● the numbers of people infected with the virus are extremely lower than in reality, since only a small part of the population has been tested (and the majority of the infected have an asymptomatic course).
To understand the seriousness of the situation (from a legal point of view) see the reactions of the press to the measures of the real Socialism of China before they were adopted in the West «... The international community should support all efforts to end this outbreak, but human rights should not be a casualty to the coronavirus crisis. The WHO declares that core principles of human rights and health includes accountability, equality and non-discrimination and participation. … China is not a democracy and the people cannot remove their leaders from power for governance failures related to the coronavirus outbreak. " <see Article>
Then the same model of real Socialism was adopted in the West, and the the press itself did not think that politicians should have been removed.
Note that the Society lockdown measures taken for Coronavirus provide for a "home arrest" of the whole population (instead of the "bracelet" we think of tracking via GPS of smartphones). A measure that is actually a "preventive arrest", until then legalized onli in the Dictatorships: now a person is arrested because it is thought that it could cause harm to other people (without knowing whether he is healthy or contaminated).
The data that are emerging on the measures taken to combat Coronavirus, make it clear that more damage than Coronavirus could have done
As early as March 17th on the New York Times «The irony of successful social distancing is that fewer will develop immunity. That means that social distancing 2.0, 3.0 and, who knows, maybe even 4.0 will very likely have to occur.
The next round of social distancing will be activated more rapidly, because officials — and the public — will be more prepared. It should also be shorter, because we can assume that most of the people who were initially infected are likely to be immune next time around. But it will still disrupt people’s lives and the economy. We will still have canceled conferences and sporting events. People will not frequent restaurants and will not travel. The service industry will be severely curtailed. And it’s going to happen again and again.» < see Article >
(taking into account that it is a disease that produces the deaths of ordinary seasonal flu, which have never created social damage such as lockdown). see Sources
The institutional data available since the beginning of the Society lockdown phase made it possible to understand how these measures were not necessary at all
● already on February 22nd (in Italy the closure of commercial activities begins on March 12th) the Director of the most important Italian Coronavirus Analysis Laboratory declares that based on the data in her possession Coronavirus is “"We swapped an infection just more serious than a flu for a lethal pandemic: it's not like that, look at the numbers" - <read Article>
● On February 25th, the Italian representative to the WHO announces that Coronavirus must be reduced: it is a normal influence «We also reduce this great alarm which is right not to be underestimated, but substantially out of 100 people 80 recover spontaneously, 15 have serious problems but that can be managed in hospital and only for 5% is lethal. Walter Ricciardi, an Italian member of the WHO Executive Committee, named councilor of the Ministry of Health ... recalled it. And it was about people [the dead] with health problems. example of normal flu. But normal flu does not kill directly, but causes decompensation in people who are already sick ".» <read Article>
● On March 17 we know that «The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population, in which the death rate from Covid-19 is much higher. … Projecting the Diamond Princess mortality rate onto the age structure of the U.S. population, the death rate among people infected with Covid-19 woluld be 0.125%. But since this estimate is based on extremely thin data the real death rate could stretch from five times lower (0.025%) to five times higher (0.625%).» <read Article>
● subsequently, on March 20, on New York times David L. Katz, the founding director of the Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center: «The data from South Korea, where tracking the coronavirus has been by far the best to date, indicate that as much as 99 percent of active cases in the general population are "mild" and do not require specific medical treatment. " - <read Article>
● March 18, it was known that 99% of dead suffered from other diseases - Bloomberg - 99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness (18-03-2020) - <read Article>
The issue from the point of view of medicine
To understand the problem caused at the institutional level we must understand, from a strictly scientific point of view, some characteristics of the Coronavirus disease.
There is no disease because our organism has "taken" Coronavirus: as with any virus epidemic, a large part of the population he has coronavirus anyway (this is not detected only because mass tests are not carried out).
But, as in a school, only a part of the people who have the virus get sick.
The disease therefore depends on the general health conditions of the person: most people with a truly healthy orgamism live with the virus without getting sick. For this reason, it is important to strengthen the organism (as Homeopathy does, for example).
see moreAs emerged from the cases of nations that have brilliantly solved the Coronavirus problem, and from medical studies that take into consideration the data that has emerged over time, Coronavirus is a normal influence. see Sources
● Economist, April 11 2020 “If millions of people were infected weeks ago without dying, the virus must be less deadly than official data suggest,” the magazine determined, using graphs to suggest the faster the disease spreads and hits its peak, the fewer people will die. Silverman and Washburne found that the coronavirus mortality rate could be as low as 0.1 percent, “similar to that of flu” <see Article - Study: Coronavirus Fatality Rate Lower than Expected, Close to Flu's 0.1%>
● February 22nd (in Italy the closure of commercial activities begins on March 12th) the Director of the most important Italian Coronavirus Analysis Laboratory declares that based on the data in her possession Coronavirus is “"We swapped an infection just more serious than a flu for a lethal pandemic: it's not like that, look at the numbers" - <read Article>
● On March 17 «The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population, in which the death rate from Covid-19 is much higher. … Projecting the Diamond Princess mortality rate onto the age structure of the U.S. population, the death rate among people infected with Covid-19 woluld be 0.125%. But since this estimate is based on extremely thin data the real death rate could stretch from five times lower (0.025%) to five times higher (0.625%).» <read Article>
● March 20, on New York times David L. Katz, the founding director of the Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center: «The data from South Korea, where tracking the coronavirus has been by far the best to date, indicate that as much as 99 percent of active cases in the general population are "mild" and do not require specific medical treatment. " - <read Article>
● March 18, it was known that 99% of dead suffered from other diseases - Bloomberg - 99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness (18-03-2020) - <read Article>
● Apr 27, 2020 - Dr. Dan Erickson: expanding the number of the population on which he applied the test he found that the data provided by the institutions are incorrect. And the percentage of deaths from Cornonavirus is extremely lower – as an ordinary annual flu (the data have been compared with those of other important medical institutions that have confirmed the data). <read Articles: “Dr. Daniel Erickson says the lockdowns have a minimal impact on containing Coronavirus” - “Tucker (Fox News): Big Tech censors dissent over coronavirus lockdowns”).
Government institutions have gradually recognized that they have disseminated incorrect data "due to problems of the mathematical models adopted" (the real data would not have justified the measures taken at the institutional level). see Sources
Dr Fauci (lead members of the US Coronavirus Task Force) initially branded those who questioned the institutional data (which led to the Social lockdown) as 'conspiracy theory'.
● Dr. Fauci refuses to accept the new scientific evidence: "Fauci dismisses 'conspiracy theory' of overstated US Covid-19 death toll. Top US official says "there is absolutely no evidence" of claims of coronavirus overcount ". The Guardian - April 09 2020 - <read Article>
● So Fauci retracted saying that in fact the data were strongly incorrect: 60,000 deaths instead of 240,000 (the figure initially announced), a 75% error! (a sensational mistake that has produced catastrophic consequences) <see Article>
Lung complications from ordinary seasonal influences have always caused the many deaths published in the statistics of Covid-19, but no one has ever thought of making a drama of it (indeed, this year in the USA there have been fewer deaths than in 2019). The only difference is this year it was decided to publish terrifying projections on the possible number of deaths (which later turned out to be grossly false).
You cannot kill a virus simply because it is not alive.
[trigger text
The virus can be countered:
● strengthening the organism (as Homeopathy does, for example): the virus does not take root in a healthy organism (keeping people confined in the house, forced to eat supermarket-food, make people weaker and attackable by the virus).
● inhibiting certain functions of the orgasm - as traditional Medcina does - so that the cells do not collaborate with the virus. However, this is a way that puts a strain on the patient's body (it is a kind of poisoning).
Because of this characteristic of the virus, vaccines are expected today, which, however, in the current state of science, are almost impossible to carry out (see next point).
On 6 April 2020 the UK government has admitted that none the antibody tests don’t work. (after weeks of using these tests to take social measures) «To be considered accurate, devices must be able to distinguish the presence in someone's blood of antibodies specific to this coronavirus, ...» see Sources ● April 6 2020 («The UK government has admitted that none of the 17.5m antibody tests it ordered in the fight against the coronavirus pandemic work well enough to be used. … The failure of the tests is a significant setback and suggests Britain may be further away from being able to launch an effective programme of mass testing. To be considered accurate, devices must be able to distinguish the presence in someone’s blood of antibodies specific to this coronavirus, ... » UK government admits Covid-19 antibody tests don’t work | Financial Times - <see Article>
This means that you cannot actually know how many people have "caught" the virus. And therefore the idea of regulating “house arrest”, or of knowing when the Society lockdown is no longer necessary, based on the results of the tests, is no longer valid.
Institutional sources reveal that the treatment of the institutional Medicine very often creates serious damage to the patient (leading to his death).
The number of such deaths in hospitals is actually staggering: for example, in the USA, hospital deaths caused by institutional medicine are the third cause of total deaths (annual deaths are 250,000, much higher than those from road accidents). see Sources ● In Italy these deaths would be 50,000 according to Assiform, while the Irccs National Cancer Institute Foundation estimates that “a realistic estimate sets the number of deaths at 30-35 thousand a year” (July 2019). However a considerable number. see Article ● Another document from Institutional Medicine – 2004, “Death by Medicine” – estimates that 783,936 Americans die each year from institutional medicine. see Article
That is, every year there are at least 3,000 deaths per month in hospitals due to errors, but today them are not taken into account in the statistics of coronavirus deaths <a class="modal-link" href="http://www.lucabottazzi.com/2/holistica/?popup=a-medicine-with-many-problems"> see more </a>
Vaccines for the flu virus are almost impossible to create (vaccines are highly specific, if the virus changes, the vaccine is inneffective):
● this virus changes continuously and therefore - since it takes months of work since a virus is discovered - when the vaccine is ready the virus has already changed (and the vaccine is ineffective)
● the virus is "intelligent" and over the years it has become increasingly capable of resisting vaccines (it is a bit of a problem with antibiotics, the use of which creates increasingly resistant bacteria).
HOLISTICA NEWS
External NEWS
-
Nolte: Dr. Fauci Is Either a Liar or a Fraud
breitbart.com
Fauci is a stone-cold liar. And if he’s not a stone-cold liar, his only defense is that he is a fraud. .
Fauci’s message was clear, militant, terrifying, and relentless: If you don’t do these things, if you don’t sacrifice these things, if you don’t give up your liberty and prosperity, you are no better than a serial killer.
And because Fauci became America’s trusted scientific (and moral) authority, because he assured us he spoke only as a scientist and infectious disease expert, because he assured us he would always tell us like it is, and do so at any cost because public health was his only priority, look at what happened…
Either way, Fauci’s a sociopath. Either he’s a sociopath who furthered his political ambitions and abused his authority and public trust to talk hundreds of millions of Americans into shattering their own lives and mental wellbeing when there was no real danger, or he’s a sociopath who chooses the good opinion of elites over raising the alarm to save the lives of thousands and thousands of protesters, and the countless millions those thousands will infect.
dailymail.co.uk
The Nation indicated by the lockdown supporters as a virtuous reference admits that it was wrong She added: 'I probably took many of the decisions out of fear. Worst case scenarios became controlling, and we kept thinking; ''how can we be a leader?''
"Lockdown measures made no difference"
redstate.com
"We have moved beyond facts and now the COVID response sits squarely in fantasy territory ... The numbers do not in the least match our response and every day it becomes more clear that Gov. Gavin Newsom has given up on pretending he even cares that most of us know he is lying. That sweet, sweet dictator nectar is just too hard to resist."
What emerges from a study conducted by Kobe City Medical Central General Hospital out of 1,000 blood samples from patients who visited the hospital in late March and early April is that coronavirus mortality may be much lower than so far we have been told by the scientific world.
breitbart.com
The millions of casualties of a continued shutdown will be hiding in plain sight, but they will be called alcoholism, homelessness, suicide, heart attack, stroke, or kidney failure. In youths it will be called financial instability, unemployment, despair, drug addiction, unplanned pregnancies, poverty, and abuse..
[RedState 2020/04/03]
( Dr Fauci, after saying that the criticisms of the figures published by him were "conspiracy theories", retracted: the projections about the coronavirus deaths go from 240,000 to 60,000 )
[Statnews.com 2020/03/17]
The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population, in which the death rate from Covid-19 is much higher. Projecting the Diamond Princess mortality rate onto the age structure of the U.S. population, the death rate among people infected with Covid-19 would be 0.125%.
[dailycaller.com 2020/04/14]
The city decided to add 3,700 people to its death tolls, who they “presumed” to have died from the virus, according to a report from The New York Times. The additions increased the death toll in the U.S. by 17%
[Breibart 2020/04/13/ from an Article of "The Economist"]
Economist, April 11 2020 “If millions of people were infected weeks ago without dying, the virus must be less deadly than official data suggest,” the magazine determined, using graphs to suggest the faster the disease spreads and hits its peak, the fewer people will die. Silverman and Washburne found that the coronavirus mortality rate could be as low as 0.1 percent, “similar to that of flu.”
[thegatewaypundit.com 2020/04]
A new study released this week in Germany shows the mortality rate of the coronavirus factoring in the asymptomatic cases is much lower than is being reported. ... Using this data the researchers concluded that the coronavirus mortality rate was 0.37% THIS ALSO MEANS THE EXPERTS AT THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION WERE OFF BY A FACTOR OF 10. It’s not clear if he [WHO leader, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus] yet understands his mistake. Regardless, it sent the global community into a collective economic meltdown. see also
[ FoxNews, [Tucker: What is the actual death rate of COVID-19 •Apr 14, 2020
In a group of pregnant women waiting to give birth in two hospitals in New York, 88% of the infected women were totally asymptomatic. Which would mean that there should be 1.3 Millions of infected people in New York who showed no symptoms. The death rate would be 0.2%.
National Center for Health Statistics
Heart disease: 647,457
Cancer: 599,108
Accidents (unintentional injuries): 169,936
Chronic lower respiratory diseases: 160,201
Stroke (cerebrovascular diseases): 146,383
Alzheimer’s disease: 121,404
Diabetes: 83,564
Influenza and pneumonia: 55,672
Nephritis, nephrotic syndrome, and nephrosis: 50,633
Intentional self-harm (suicide): 47,173
--------- FINE PROVVISORIA (duplic la pagina) ------------
Articles latests
Main Tree
- Culture Issues: 1) the lack of a basic scientific Culture: the inability to discern between true and false
- SOME CAUSES OF THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF DISCERNING BETWEEN TRUE AND FALSE
- The induction of a “spontaneous censorship” by Crowd based on widespread denigration
- Culture Issues: 2) The need to reporting information to a (really) scientific dimension
- The Issue of Coronavirus Institutional measuresPOST
1 - intro: PROBLEMI EVIDENTIAI VARI LIVELLI (popup)
Il fenomeno Coronavirus è stato segnato da grossi errori
da parte delle “Istituzioni” governative e scientifiche.
Tale erroneità risulta evidente
anche solo ad una superficiale analisi
(di tipo scientifico)
VEDI POPUP
1 - intro: PROBLEMI EVIDENTIAI VARI LIVELLI (popup)
Il fenomeno Coronavirus è stato segnato da grossi errori
da parte delle “Istituzioni” governative e scientifiche.
Tale erroneità risulta evidente
anche solo ad una superficiale analisi
(di tipo scientifico)
VEDI POPUP
1 - intro: PROBLEMI EVIDENTIAI VARI LIVELLI (popup)
Il fenomeno Coronavirus è stato segnato da grossi errori
da parte delle “Istituzioni” governative e scientifiche.
Tale erroneità risulta evidente
anche solo ad una superficiale analisi
(di tipo scientifico)
VEDI POPUP
BLOG
(rifai)Little by little,
the fact emerges that the institutions
- and the mainstream media -
have made big mistakes in addressing the Coronavirus epidemic.
Mistakes that cost very dearly
in terms of public health and safety.
la questione ora è fare il punto della situazione rivalutando i dati emersi per comprendere come .. evitare che ciò accada di nuovo
situazione (in proress)
la questione istituzionale ..
1) di dati statistici utilizzati per indire le misure di “lotta conto la Pandemia” sono assoluamente phoney (si è iniziato parlando di 3.4% di death rate quando si sapeva già che si trattava di una “normale influenza”).
2) a conferma della mancanza di scientificità (e di buona fede) da parte delle Istituzioni governative e scientifiche, esse, per giustificare le misure come il Social lockdown, hanno continuato ad utilizzare i phoney data per fare proiezioni che dipingono un futuro drammatico in fatto di morti anche quando le Istituzioni scientifiche globali (indipendenti) annunciavano – agli inizi di Aprile – che la percentuale di morti era dello 0.6% (destinata a scendere con un miglioramento .. dei dati ...)
3) le misure drastiche prese in nome della “lotta al Coronavirus” (la quale, come ci illustrano i dati citati in precedenza, è di per sé ingiustificata) sono effettivamente illegali
4) le misure prese dalle Istituzioni producono un danno maggiore di quello che avrebbe prodotto l’”influenza del Coronavirus”.
più danno di quello che si sarebbe avuto ..
La questione “Medica” del problema
■ Il coronavirus lo hanno tutti, non si prende .. In certe circostanze diviene attivo.
