■ Collection of Articles: *Intro2Disruption
term-top
∙Why the big companies cannot innovate within them (Disruptive mindset) [1]
It is useless to try to bring innovation into companies that are not themselves innovated (which are structured on an obsolete mindset). The innovation…
‘Manifesto of Innovation (2): Innovation in the new post-industrial Market’≈
A third phase of the development of the modern (post-industrial) Company / Market is in progress. THE SOCIETY MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS IS NOW MANAGED “BOTTOM UP”. A new Economy based on Subsidiarity is developed, and A POST-INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION MODE THAT EXCEEDS THE “MASS PRODUCTION”.
‘Manifesto of Innovation (1): the basic principles of sustainable innovation’≈
Today there is no critical reflection on the failures of the Market, and therefore it continues unabated to proceed WITH THE SAME MINDSET (PARADIGM) WHICH HAS PRODUCED THE PROBLEMS THAT WE WANT TO SOLVE. A reflection on the basic principles of sustainable innovation.
°The difficulty of understanding (to explain) the concept of radical change (disruptive innovation)
There is a lack of of the meaning of the terms referred to innovation like “radical”, “different” (“disruptive”). This does not allow the majority of the Market Player to develop a truly salable value. These terms indicate a substantial difference, or something absolutely new which is found on a plan completely different from the previous one. but today efforts are being made to develop “different” strategies which, however, remain on the same level, on the same qualitative level as the previous strategies.
The basic misunderstanding on Real (Disruptive) Innovation
Disruptive innovation is a “revolution” of the context in which it operates: this means “radical change” (from the roots) of culture, of the mindset used up to that point (change of operating principles, of conception of values, of a design approach, of types of communication, etc.).
A phase of radical changes (Key of Changes #1)
We live in an era of profound and rapid changes, in a breaking point° in the evolution of the Market: a Disruption Age° in which…
The lack of a real Innovation
Today there is no real innovation (attractive and sustainable for Customer), both by the part of the Big Player of the Market and by the part of the Public Administration. ► the Public Administration continues to be oriented towards costly (insustanable) solutions ► the Big Players of the Market continue to develop a pseudo-innovation █ THE LACK OF A VALUE-ORIENTED INNOVATION (effectively useful and sustainable): it is necessary
TO RESET THE INNOVATION.
The great Firms are not able to develop disruptive innovation within them
the consolidated companies of the market literally can’t develop disruptive innovation within them. they are the object of disruption, and therefore can not be the subject. the problem: ● lack of “intuition” ● lack of culture of (real) innovation. a real (disruptive) innovation can only come with a fresh start, from new comers.
