Today the West speaks of Peace, in reality
it refers to something that is not peace at all:
it is instead something that
some Great Powers need to develop their own interests
at the expense of other countries
(Ukraine, Baltic countries, etc ..).
That is, the West today, in order to better develop its interests. uses a trick based on a play on words – demagogy – with which it wants to make something that is not at all appear positive.
A lethal trap for Ukraine – as we will see – into which it must not fall.
The lethal trap of the position of support for Ukraine by the great powers: the proposal of a false condition of peace
The issue is in fact that after the Davos 2022 global finance conference there has been an alignment of the Great Powers on a line in which the main points are:
– they propose to support Ukraine in order to bring it to a condition of Peace soon. But in that
– it is assumed that Ukraine should cede Donbass and Crimea to Russia.
(The latter concept is obviously very rarely expressed, and with euphemisms such as “to have Peace it is necessary to concede something to Russia”, since this concept – however refined the demagogy may be – is difficult for most to accept).
.
The problem is that these two concepts are in stark contradiction between them. That is to say
in this way there can be no peace condition
(and there is not even a Ukraine).
.
More specifically,
● If Ukraine does not regain possession of Donbass and Crimea, it will not revert to being a sovereign state.
Of course, the final decisions on Donbass and Crimea must be left to referendum – this time legal. But Russia has to withdraw from them.
The fact is that in the absence of such conditions there would be no real Ukraine. so long as
– the threat of invasion by Russia that existed before this war would be even greater with the Russian Army “legitimized” by not being punished for invading Ukraine. <see text “The measures that we can (and must) take: Actions by international bodies such as the international criminal court“>
Furthermore, Ukraine, in this condition,
– it would have to renounce decisive parts for its economy (natural resources and industries present on these territories), and therefore it would not be able to regain its place in international commercial relations (and in the EU it would be considered with a secondary member, admitted to be accepted).
<see GCW text “The key-points to be able to conceive a “sustainable reconstruction” of Ukraine: The question of (real) Sovereignty“>
.
● if Russia is not officially defeated (with the consequent fall of Putin), the whole Western world will remain subject to Putin who, among other things, will continue
– to blackmail the West in supplying natural gas.
– to develop its plan for the “annexation” of neighboring nations. With serious consequences for Urkaine (and other nations such as the Baltic countries and Moldova).
Note that by avoiding Putin’s defeat (and fall), China would feel entitled to develop its already planned military invasion plan in neighboring states such as Taiwan.
.
See the GCW texts in this regard:
-<see GCW text “Some clarifications on the two fundamental concepts “peace” and “aid” (the “debt-trap diplomacy”)“>
– Putin’s fall is necessary to reach a real condition of Peace. <see GCW article “With Putin in power, nothing positive can be done (the Putin’s fall)“>
– the West, paradoxically, does not realize that with a defeated Russia, and therefore resized, there would be advantages for all <see GCW article “The sharp downsizing of post-Putin Russia (Russia will no longer be a problem for the west, but an advantage)“>
See also GCW article: “.. the mistake of aiming .. EU ..” ***
