■ Key Topic: What to do?

8 posts

Why “dissidents” must change the way they communicate

Today we try to explain to the public what is really happening now (Covid, economic crisis, etc …) but it is not possibleto make the most understand the truthswhich in themselves are solid and irrefutable. That is, the problem is not the difficulty of explaining the truthfulness of information that is in itself “objective”, and irrefutable. That is, the problem is not on a rational level, […]

Why it is necessary to change the approach to information

The concepts used today by the dominant thought (“deniers”, “no vax”) are not concepts at all, but are the result of an emotional condition in which people are kept thanks to a brainwashing that begins during the school years, and is then maintained by the media. In this condition, people are not at all able to see reality for what it is: they believe they see […]

What to do now: the need to redefine strategies

This entry is part 1 of 3 in the series ► Redefine information modalities

“If repeated attempts to change a system fail, it means that there are errors in the principles [of your action].” Einstein Today, those who want to defend themselves from the abuses of the institutions continue to make the fatal mistake of competing with the institutions on their own ground (on their own weapons). The basic error that is committed is subtle, devious: one moves by reasoning […]

How to define a new approach to dissident information

This entry is part 3 of 3 in the series ► Redefine information modalities

The problem, as mentioned in the previous article, the dissident communication currently developed is not only unable to make most people understand what is really happening, but causes resentment on their part which justifies the repression implemented by the institutions. So it is a question of developing new forms of communication that are able to make the most understand how much information that is not in […]

∙An elementary (reassuring) approach of “dissident information”

This entry is part 2 of 3 in the series ► Redefine information modalities

Today things are getting worse and worse: institutions commit “mistakes” that create ever greater social problems. This happens despite the fact that there is irrefutable evidence of the wrongness of these choices. This worsening of the situation indicates, among other things, such as who is trying to develop an Information “dissident” than that of the dominant thought, actually commits fatal errors. That is, today, those who […]

What to do now?

This entry is part 1 of 3 in the series ► COVID: What to do?

Emerging the fact that the institutions have produced enormous damage to populations (both from a health and a social point of view) the question is now to investigate what has happened so that this does not happen again. The same is true of Trump’s failure to restore Democracy to its original dimension. And in order for these facts not to happen again in the future it […]

The need to attribute responsibility to the institutions

This entry is part 3 of 3 in the series ► COVID: What to do?

«THE PROTAGONISTS OF THE CATASTROPHE OF THE measures TAKEN FOR THE CORONAVIRUS 2020I REFUSE THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES: the experts say “We didn’t make the decisions,” the rulers say “it’s not our fault because we have been ravaged by incapable consultants”» Salvatore Rainò So that the catastrophe created by the measures of the “Coronavirus 2020 emergency” does not happen again, it is necessary to be able to attribute […]

Why the reopening has proven to be safe (and necessary)

This entry is part 2 of 3 in the series ► COVID: What to do?

Now that some of the most important international scientific Institutions [see below] have shown how Coronavirus is just a normal flu and therefore the lockdown should not have been implemented some government institutions apply “resistance” to the removal of the Society lockdown. . It will be interesting to see how the people who apply these policies today in the future will try to defend their reputation […]