Little by little,
the fact emerges that the institutions
- and the mainstream media -
have made big mistakes in addressing the Coronavirus epidemic.
Mistakes that cost very dearly
in terms of public health and safety.
the question now is to make the point of the situation
by evaluating the data that emerged
to understand how to prevent this from happening again
The institutional issue: what are the proven errors
What emerges on the Coronavirus reveals catastrophic errors by the Institiuion (which took drastic measures when it was already known that it was based on false data).
The institutional data available since the beginning of the Society lockdown phase made it possible to understand how these measures were not necessary at all
● already on February 22nd (in Italy the closure of commercial activities begins on March 12th) the Director of the most important Italian Coronavirus Analysis Laboratory declares that based on the data in her possession Coronavirus is “"We swapped an infection just more serious than a flu for a lethal pandemic: it's not like that, look at the numbers" - <read Article>
● On February 25th, the Italian representative to the WHO announces that Coronavirus must be reduced: it is a normal influence «We also reduce this great alarm which is right not to be underestimated, but substantially out of 100 people 80 recover spontaneously, 15 have serious problems but that can be managed in hospital and only for 5% is lethal. Walter Ricciardi, an Italian member of the WHO Executive Committee, named councilor of the Ministry of Health ... recalled it. And it was about people [the dead] with health problems. example of normal flu. But normal flu does not kill directly, but causes decompensation in people who are already sick ".» <read Article>
● On March 17 we know that «The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population, in which the death rate from Covid-19 is much higher. … Projecting the Diamond Princess mortality rate onto the age structure of the U.S. population, the death rate among people infected with Covid-19 woluld be 0.125%. But since this estimate is based on extremely thin data the real death rate could stretch from five times lower (0.025%) to five times higher (0.625%).» <read Article>
● subsequently, on March 20, on New York times David L. Katz, the founding director of the Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center: «The data from South Korea, where tracking the coronavirus has been by far the best to date, indicate that as much as 99 percent of active cases in the general population are "mild" and do not require specific medical treatment. " - <read Article>
● March 18, it was known that 99% of dead suffered from other diseases - Bloomberg - 99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness (18-03-2020) - <read Article>
● the CDC (US health protection agency) imposes to falsify the "death certificates" «Issued March 24, the guidance tells hospitals to list COVID-19 as a cause of death regardless of whether or not there is actual testing to confirm that's the case.
Instead, even if the coronavirus was just a contributing factor or if it’s “assumed to have caused or contributed to death,” it can be listed as the primary cause.» - “CDC Tells Hospitals To List COVID as Cause of Death Even if You're Just Assuming or It Only Contributed” - <read Article>
● New York Citty NYC Adds Nearly 4,000 People Who Never Tested Positive <read Article>
● it was known that 99% of dead suffered from other diseases - Bloomberg - 99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness (18-03-2020) - <read Article>
● the CDC (US health protection agency) imposes to falsify the "death certificates" «Issued March 24, the guidance tells hospitals to list COVID-19 as a cause of death regardless of whether or not there is actual testing to confirm that's the case.
Instead, even if the coronavirus was just a contributing factor or if it’s “assumed to have caused or contributed to death,” it can be listed as the primary cause.» - “CDC Tells Hospitals To List COVID as Cause of Death Even if You're Just Assuming or It Only Contributed” - <read Article>
● New York Citty NYC Adds Nearly 4,000 People Who Never Tested Positive <read Article>
● it was known that 99% of dead suffered from other diseases - Bloomberg - 99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness (18-03-2020) - <read Article>
● the CDC (US health protection agency) imposes to falsify the "death certificates" «Issued March 24, the guidance tells hospitals to list COVID-19 as a cause of death regardless of whether or not there is actual testing to confirm that's the case.
Instead, even if the coronavirus was just a contributing factor or if it’s “assumed to have caused or contributed to death,” it can be listed as the primary cause.» - “CDC Tells Hospitals To List COVID as Cause of Death Even if You're Just Assuming or It Only Contributed” - <read Article>
● New York Citty NYC Adds Nearly 4,000 People Who Never Tested Positive <read Article>
● it was known that 99% of dead suffered from other diseases - Bloomberg - 99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness (18-03-2020) - <read Article>
● A Lancet (Wikipedia: "It is among the world's oldest, most prestigious, and best known general medical journals.") study reveals that “The death rate from COVID-19 is likely around 0.66%” Live Science - <read Article>
● Dr. Fauci refuses to accept the new scientific evidence: “Fauci dismisses 'conspiracy theory' of overstated US Covid-19 death toll. Top US official says ‘there is absolutely no evidence’ of claims of coronavirus overcount”. The Guardian – April 09 - <read Article>
● an example of how the press at the global level argued uncritically: a rollout of the Mainstream media of April 7, when Fauci's error was now evident The Guardian -<see Article>
[see external references]
● the CDC (US health protection agency) imposes to falsify the "death certificates" «Issued March 24, the guidance tells hospitals to list COVID-19 as a cause of death regardless of whether or not there is actual testing to confirm that's the case.
Instead, even if the coronavirus was just a contributing factor or if it’s “assumed to have caused or contributed to death,” it can be listed as the primary cause.» - “CDC Tells Hospitals To List COVID as Cause of Death Even if You're Just Assuming or It Only Contributed” - <read Article>
● New York Citty NYC Adds Nearly 4,000 People Who Never Tested Positive <read Article>
● it was known that 99% of dead suffered from other diseases - Bloomberg - 99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness (18-03-2020) - <read Article>
As early as March 17th on the New York Times «The irony of successful social distancing is that fewer will develop immunity. That means that social distancing 2.0, 3.0 and, who knows, maybe even 4.0 will very likely have to occur.
The next round of social distancing will be activated more rapidly, because officials — and the public — will be more prepared. It should also be shorter, because we can assume that most of the people who were initially infected are likely to be immune next time around. But it will still disrupt people’s lives and the economy. We will still have canceled conferences and sporting events. People will not frequent restaurants and will not travel. The service industry will be severely curtailed. And it’s going to happen again and again.» < see Article >
The institutional data available since the beginning of the Society lockdown phase made it possible to understand how these measures were not necessary at all
● already on February 22nd (in Italy the closure of commercial activities begins on March 12th) the Director of the most important Italian Coronavirus Analysis Laboratory declares that based on the data in her possession Coronavirus is “"We swapped an infection just more serious than a flu for a lethal pandemic: it's not like that, look at the numbers" - <read Article>
● On February 25th, the Italian representative to the WHO announces that Coronavirus must be reduced: it is a normal influence «We also reduce this great alarm which is right not to be underestimated, but substantially out of 100 people 80 recover spontaneously, 15 have serious problems but that can be managed in hospital and only for 5% is lethal. Walter Ricciardi, an Italian member of the WHO Executive Committee, named councilor of the Ministry of Health ... recalled it. And it was about people [the dead] with health problems. example of normal flu. But normal flu does not kill directly, but causes decompensation in people who are already sick ".» <read Article>
● On March 17 we know that «The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population, in which the death rate from Covid-19 is much higher. … Projecting the Diamond Princess mortality rate onto the age structure of the U.S. population, the death rate among people infected with Covid-19 woluld be 0.125%. But since this estimate is based on extremely thin data the real death rate could stretch from five times lower (0.025%) to five times higher (0.625%).» <read Article>
● subsequently, on March 20, on New York times David L. Katz, the founding director of the Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center: «The data from South Korea, where tracking the coronavirus has been by far the best to date, indicate that as much as 99 percent of active cases in the general population are "mild" and do not require specific medical treatment. " - <read Article>
● March 18, it was known that 99% of dead suffered from other diseases - Bloomberg - 99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness (18-03-2020) - <read Article>
The issue from the point of view of medicine
To understand the problem caused at the institutional level we must understand, from a strictly scientific point of view, some characteristics of the Coronavirus disease.
● Economist, April 11 2020 “If millions of people were infected weeks ago without dying, the virus must be less deadly than official data suggest,” the magazine determined, using graphs to suggest the faster the disease spreads and hits its peak, the fewer people will die. Silverman and Washburne found that the coronavirus mortality rate could be as low as 0.1 percent, “similar to that of flu” <see Article - Study: Coronavirus Fatality Rate Lower than Expected, Close to Flu's 0.1%>
● February 22nd (in Italy the closure of commercial activities begins on March 12th) the Director of the most important Italian Coronavirus Analysis Laboratory declares that based on the data in her possession Coronavirus is “"We swapped an infection just more serious than a flu for a lethal pandemic: it's not like that, look at the numbers" - <read Article>
● On March 17 «The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population, in which the death rate from Covid-19 is much higher. … Projecting the Diamond Princess mortality rate onto the age structure of the U.S. population, the death rate among people infected with Covid-19 woluld be 0.125%. But since this estimate is based on extremely thin data the real death rate could stretch from five times lower (0.025%) to five times higher (0.625%).» <read Article>
● March 20, on New York times David L. Katz, the founding director of the Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center: «The data from South Korea, where tracking the coronavirus has been by far the best to date, indicate that as much as 99 percent of active cases in the general population are "mild" and do not require specific medical treatment. " - <read Article>
● March 18, it was known that 99% of dead suffered from other diseases - Bloomberg - 99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness (18-03-2020) - <read Article>
● Apr 27, 2020 - Dr. Dan Erickson: expanding the number of the population on which he applied the test he found that the data provided by the institutions are incorrect. And the percentage of deaths from Cornonavirus is extremely lower – as an ordinary annual flu (the data have been compared with those of other important medical institutions that have confirmed the data). <read Articles: “Dr. Daniel Erickson says the lockdowns have a minimal impact on containing Coronavirus” - “Tucker (Fox News): Big Tech censors dissent over coronavirus lockdowns”).
Dr Fauci (lead members of the US Coronavirus Task Force) initially branded those who questioned the institutional data (which led to the Social lockdown) as 'conspiracy theory'.
● Dr. Fauci refuses to accept the new scientific evidence: "Fauci dismisses 'conspiracy theory' of overstated US Covid-19 death toll. Top US official says "there is absolutely no evidence" of claims of coronavirus overcount ". The Guardian - April 09 2020 - <read Article>
● So Fauci retracted saying that in fact the data were strongly incorrect: 60,000 deaths instead of 240,000 (the figure initially announced), a 75% error! (a sensational mistake that has produced catastrophic consequences) <see Article>
● April 6 2020 («The UK government has admitted that none of the 17.5m antibody tests it ordered in the fight against the coronavirus pandemic work well enough to be used. … The failure of the tests is a significant setback and suggests Britain may be further away from being able to launch an effective programme of mass testing. To be considered accurate, devices must be able to distinguish the presence in someone’s blood of antibodies specific to this coronavirus, ... » UK government admits Covid-19 antibody tests don’t work | Financial Times - <see Article>
● In Italy these deaths would be 50,000 according to Assiform, while the Irccs National Cancer Institute Foundation estimates that “a realistic estimate sets the number of deaths at 30-35 thousand a year” (July 2019). However a considerable number. see Article
● Another document from Institutional Medicine – 2004, “Death by Medicine” – estimates that 783,936 Americans die each year from institutional medicine. see Article
If
- as is clear from the official data -
that this is basically a normal influence,
what responsibilities do governments have? see more
How many days are lost for a return to normal?
For how many days it has been scientifically proven that the Conornavurus problem did not exist (March 30, 2020), and therefore the state of emergency for the Society should have ceased. see Sources
A scientific communication
that could not be ignored is that
published on March 30 2020 by a group of Scientists on Lancet
(Wikipedia: "It is among the world's oldest, most prestigious, and best known general medical journals."): a study that reveals that "The death rate from COVID-19 is likely around 0.66%" Live Science - <see Source>
It should also be borne in mind that it was already known that .66% would further decrease significantly as tests were carried out on the population (in fact after a few days it was found that the death rate was 0.1%).
.
In fact, this had been known for a long time, since South Korea and Taiwan - which had just successfully overcome the epidemic - had communicated that it was a normal flu.
Moreover:
● already on February 22nd (in Italy the closure of commercial activities begins on March 12th) the Director of the most important Italian Coronavirus Analysis Laboratory declares that based on the data in her possession Coronavirus is “"We swapped an infection just more serious than a flu for a lethal pandemic: it's not like that, look at the numbers" - <read Article>
● subsequently, on March 20, on New York times David L. Katz, the founding director of the Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center: «The data from South Korea, where tracking the coronavirus has been by far the best to date, indicate that as much as 99 percent of active cases in the general population are "mild" and do not require specific medical treatment. " - <read Article>
On March 17 we knew that «The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population, in which the death rate from Covid-19 is much higher. … Projecting the Diamond Princess mortality rate onto the age structure of the U.S. population, the death rate among people infected with Covid-19 woluld be 0.125%. But since this estimate is based on extremely thin data the real death rate could stretch from five times lower (0.025%) to five times higher (0.625%).» < read article >
● March 18, it was known that 99% of dead suffered from other diseases - Bloomberg - 99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness (18-03-2020) - <read Article>
