Little by little,
the fact emerges that the institutions
- and the mainstream media -
have made big mistakes in addressing the Coronavirus epidemic.
Mistakes that cost very dearly
in terms of public health and safety.
But institutions, apparently inexplicable,
insist on divulging false data,
and on the need for lockdown.
Coronavirus is only normal flu
To understand the problem caused at the institutional level we must understand, from a strictly scientific point of view, some characteristics of the Coronavirus disease.
Data are "manipulated" according to the "guidelines" of institutions
The percentages turned out to be very high because in the arithmetic division (fraction) from which the percentages of death derive, both numbers were falsified. The fraction:
DIVIDEND{tooltip}*{end-texte} Governments have forced hospitals to falsify death certificates{end-tooltip} - DEATHS people number
(example, 4,000 out of 10,000 "fake" deaths were reported in New York) - see Sources ● the CDC (US health protection agency) imposes to falsify the "death certificates" «Issued March 24, the guidance tells hospitals to list COVID-19 as a cause of death regardless of whether or not there is actual testing to confirm that's the case. Instead, even if the coronavirus was just a contributing factor or if it’s “assumed to have caused or contributed to death,” it can be listed as the primary cause.» - “CDC Tells Hospitals To List COVID as Cause of Death Even if You're Just Assuming or It Only Contributed” - <read Article> ● New York Citty NYC Adds Nearly 4,000 People Who Never Tested Positive <read Article> ● it was known that 99% of dead suffered from other diseases - Bloomberg - 99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness (18-03-2020) - <read Article>
──────────────────
DIVIDER{tooltip}*{end-texte} unlike the real data published by South Korea - which indicated that it was a simple influence - where tests were carried out on a large part of the population, in the West only a small part was tested of the population, making the statistics bogus. {end-tooltip} - INFECTED people number
(where hundreds of thousands were considered, in reality they were millions)
See external Articles - read more - "Consequences of data “manipulation”"
The measures taken, in addition to be unjustified, are illegal
The lockdown imposed on citizens is a measure inspired by Communist China, which consists of a "home arrest". Actually they are a "preventive arrest" to prevent one person from causing harm to others: but almost the majority of people are not even suspected of being infected!
The Constitutions of Western Democracy do not allow the suspension of fundamental human freedoms: in this case the Constitutions were suspended in the name of subjective consideration (of people who have proven themselves incompetent, if not in bad faith). See external Articles - read more
The data is false (from the beginning)
The decision to implement lockdowns was based on false measures. Later the most authoritative scientific sources showed that it was a normal flu (0.1% of deaths), but the data of the Governative Institutions indicated vastly higher figures. see Sources The institutional data available since the beginning of the Society lockdown phase made it possible to understand how these measures were not necessary at all ● already on February 22nd (in Italy the closure of commercial activities begins on March 12th) the Director of the most important Italian Coronavirus Analysis Laboratory declares that based on the data in her possession Coronavirus is “"We swapped an infection just more serious than a flu for a lethal pandemic: it's not like that, look at the numbers" - <read Article> ● On February 25th, the Italian representative to the WHO announces that Coronavirus must be reduced: it is a normal influence «We also reduce this great alarm which is right not to be underestimated, but substantially out of 100 people 80 recover spontaneously, 15 have serious problems but that can be managed in hospital and only for 5% is lethal. Walter Ricciardi, an Italian member of the WHO Executive Committee, named councilor of the Ministry of Health ... recalled it. And it was about people [the dead] with health problems. example of normal flu. But normal flu does not kill directly, but causes decompensation in people who are already sick ".» <read Article> ● On March 17 we know that «The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population, in which the death rate from Covid-19 is much higher. … Projecting the Diamond Princess mortality rate onto the age structure of the U.S. population, the death rate among people infected with Covid-19 woluld be 0.125%. But since this estimate is based on extremely thin data the real death rate could stretch from five times lower (0.025%) to five times higher (0.625%).» <read Article> ● subsequently, on March 20, on New York times David L. Katz, the founding director of the Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center: «The data from South Korea, where tracking the coronavirus has been by far the best to date, indicate that as much as 99 percent of active cases in the general population are "mild" and do not require specific medical treatment. " - <read Article> ● March 18, it was known that 99% of dead suffered from other diseases - Bloomberg - 99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness (18-03-2020) - <read Article>
In the final balance it emerges that the closure has not brought any advantage, on the contrary ...
There was no difference in deaths from the epidemic between the closed and open States.
Today - by continuing to provide false data - measures are maintained that themselves produce catastrophic consequences for citizens (including additional deaths not due to Coronavirus).see Source As early as March 17th on the New York Times «The irony of successful social distancing is that fewer will develop immunity. That means that social distancing 2.0, 3.0 and, who knows, maybe even 4.0 will very likely have to occur. The next round of social distancing will be activated more rapidly, because officials — and the public — will be more prepared. It should also be shorter, because we can assume that most of the people who were initially infected are likely to be immune next time around. But it will still disrupt people’s lives and the economy. We will still have canceled conferences and sporting events. People will not frequent restaurants and will not travel. The service industry will be severely curtailed. And it’s going to happen again and again.» < see Article >
Although the data has been shown to be false, the Institutions resists to give up misures
Governments and scientific Institutions insist on the need for social lockdown, painting a literally invented dramatic scenario this confirms the lack of scientificity (and good faith) by government and scientific institutions). See external Articles
Other specific problems
The Situation
Now that the situation is cleared up – Coronavirus is only a normal influence - there are two fundamental reactions from the Institutions and the People:
● those who thought there was a real emergency UNJUSTIFIABLY INSIST THAT STRONG MEASURES SUCH AS THE SOCIETY LOCKDOWN SHOULD CONTINUE TO BE FOLLOWED.
● those who have understood that an emergency that has never existed has invented, BEGINS TO TAKE ACTION TO RECOVER A SITUATION OF "NORMALITY" - acting in this way contravenes the "Emergency Laws".
daily progress news [by HOLISTICA]
How many days are lost for a return to normal?
For how many days it has been scientifically proven that the Conornavurus problem did not exist (March 30, 2020), and therefore the state of emergency for the Society should have ceased. see Sources
A scientific communication
that could not be ignored is that
published on March 30 2020 by a group of Scientists on Lancet
(Wikipedia: "It is among the world's oldest, most prestigious, and best known general medical journals."): a study that reveals that "The death rate from COVID-19 is likely around 0.66%" Live Science - <see Source>
It should also be borne in mind that it was already known that .66% would further decrease significantly as tests were carried out on the population (in fact after a few days it was found that the death rate was 0.1%).
.
In fact, this had been known for a long time, since South Korea and Taiwan - which had just successfully overcome the epidemic - had communicated that it was a normal flu.
Moreover:
● already on February 22nd (in Italy the closure of commercial activities begins on March 12th) the Director of the most important Italian Coronavirus Analysis Laboratory declares that based on the data in her possession Coronavirus is “"We swapped an infection just more serious than a flu for a lethal pandemic: it's not like that, look at the numbers" - <read Article>
● subsequently, on March 20, on New York times David L. Katz, the founding director of the Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center: «The data from South Korea, where tracking the coronavirus has been by far the best to date, indicate that as much as 99 percent of active cases in the general population are "mild" and do not require specific medical treatment. " - <read Article>
On March 17 we knew that «The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population, in which the death rate from Covid-19 is much higher. … Projecting the Diamond Princess mortality rate onto the age structure of the U.S. population, the death rate among people infected with Covid-19 woluld be 0.125%. But since this estimate is based on extremely thin data the real death rate could stretch from five times lower (0.025%) to five times higher (0.625%).» < read article >
● March 18, it was known that 99% of dead suffered from other diseases - Bloomberg - 99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness (18-03-2020) - <read Article>
If
- as is clear from the official data -
that this is basically a normal influence,
what responsibilities do governments have? see more
It is necessary to clarify how this could have happened
- by investigating in depth -
to understand how we can prevent this from happening again. see more
HOLISITCA promotes an investigation on Coronavirus investigation by opening to collaborations <see more>
