- I.b.1 – Why it is necessary to change the policy of the Conservatives (the failure of their current policy)
- I.b.2 – Why there is a need for a disruptive innovation of “dissident” Media
- I.b.3 – ∙Why “dissidents” must change the way they communicate: people no longer understand rational truths
The concepts used today by the dominant thought (comcepts like “deniers”, “no vax”) are not concepts at all, but are the result of an emotional condition in which people are kept thanks to a brainwashing that begins during the school years, and is then maintained by the media.
In this condition, people are not at all able to see reality for what it is: they believe they see things that don’t exist just because their hypnotists make them believe it.
These topics are illustrated in other articles, such as “Hypno-governance: Mass hypnosis”
.
The current problem is that
(1)
it is not possible to try to reason with most people
In other words, it is not a question of explaining (in a rational way) the actual truths that are available, but it is rather a matter of following a maieutic path with which people are led to recover the ability to perceive actual reality. And to begin to reason with one’s conscience again. There are no shortcuts. <see my text “Psycho-Politics- the armor (mental barrier) of the minds: bigotry“>
Those who make “dissident” information must begin to reflect on the fact that if they are not able to understand the meaning of the information they propose – which are of irrefutable validity – it is because there is something wrong at the basis of their own approach. <see m text “How to define a new approach to dissident information“>
As Einstein told us: “If repeated attempts to change a system fail, it means that there are errors in the principles (of one’s action)”.
(2)
it is necessary to modify one’s approach to change upstream:
IT IS ABOUT BEGINNING TO ACTUALLY CHANGE
WITHOUT WAITING FOR THE PERMIT AND SUPPORT OF THE INSTITUTIONS
That is, it is necessary to understand that
● try to “explain” things to the public – even if we have clearly documented and irrefutable truths – not only does not bring any change, but produces a worsening of things (the constituted power uses dissident information to legitimize further censorship measures and repression)
● trying to be “listened to” by the institutions is just a waste of time since the institutions will never have any intention of “listening” to ideas that are not in line with their thinking (in this way it takes the deception of the institutions that try to distract dissidents from initiatives of real change: we return to the naive, childish dimension of when we tried to make the teacher listen to our reasons).
.
A gratifying consideration:
(3)
the “constituted powers” have reached a point where they have begun a gradual self-destruction
That is, today those who govern have entered a condition of “delusion of omnipotence” in which “regimes” arrive sooner or later: a condition in which the Rulers live in a dimension that is distant from the real life of citizens, and end up exaggerating in the application of their authority. <see my text “The evolution of the methods of government of “empires” (of the State)“>
.
In other words
it is not possible to change things with the same approach that was used to create the problem
And therefore today it is necessary to abandon the current field of confrontation with the institutions: it is necessary to stop reasoning in the same way as the dominant thought:
– it is not a question of being more convincing by using “communication” as it is now conceived. In this way, we basically try to convince people with a sort of “propaganda” which, although in this case “right”, cannot have any effect on institutional propaganda. Instead, it is a question of radically changing the way of providing information. <see my text “How to define a new approach to dissident information“>
– you cannot use the “hard ways”, such as protest. In this case, however, we are the losers, both in the direct test of strength and against public opinion, which, not being able to understand what is happening, takes the side of the institutions.
.
.
Obviously, on a more in-depth analysis, it appears that it is necessary to extend the action of change beyond the limits of Information: to make change easier and more solid, it is necessary to develop initiatives that bring government to its original dimension: Government by the People.
This can be done “from the small”, from the bottom, from the ultra-local: for example with initiatives in which citizens organize themselves from below to collect data on pollution in their territory, or on the situations of Public Health <see my text “Bottom-up Initiatives to strengthen the position of “dissidents”>
Or, for a deeper change, start organizing forms of bottom-up government at the local level <see my Article “Beyond top-down “Democracy”: crowdisation of Governance“>
See series of my Articles:
